Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Investigations of High Pressure Steel Cylinders from China, Int'l Trade Comm'n Inv. Nos. 701-TA-480 and 731-TA-1188; Dep't of Commerce Case Nos. A-570-977 and C-570-978
Helped obtain a unanimous final affirmative antidumping and countervailing duty determination from the ITC on behalf of Texas company Norris Cylinder Company, a subsidiary of diversified manufacturer TriMas Corporation. The ITC found that Norris was injured by cylinders subsidized by the government of China and dumped into the U.S. market by producers in China.
In the Matter of Certain Screen Printing Machines, Vision Alignment Devices Used Therein, and Parts Thereof (337-TA-488, Speedline Technologies, Inc. v. Ekra GmBH and Ekra America, Inc.)
Represented Ekra GmbH, and its U.S. subsidiary, Ekra America, Inc., in connection with investigation of certain screen alignment devices for the production of computer circuit boards.
In the Matter of Certain High Intensity Retroreflective Sheeting (337-TA-268, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. v. Seibu Pollymer Chemical Co., Ltd. and Seibulite International, Inc.)
Represented Seibu companies in connection with allegations of infringement of patent covering retroreflective backing in highway signage.
In re Certain Semiconductor Memory Devices and Products Containing Same, (337-TA-414, Micron Technology, Inc. v. Mosel Vitelic)
Represented Mosel Vitelic in a patent infringement case involving semiconductor dynamic random access memory (DRAM) devices.
In the Matter of Certain HSP Modems, Software and Hardware Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same (337-TA-439, PCTEL, Inc. v. Smart Link Ltd., & ESS Technology, Inc.)
Represented PCTEL in patent infringement case involving HSP (host signal processing) modems.
In the Matter of Certain Personal Computers and Digital Display Devices (337-TA-606, Hewlett –Packard v. Acer, Inc. and Acer America Corporation)
Represented Wistron Corporation, a leading Taiwanese original design and computer manufacturer, in connection with investigation concerning allegations by Hewlett Packard Corporation of patent infringement by Acer Inc. for which Wistron manufactures several laptop models.
In the Matter of Certain Field Programmable Gate Arrays and Products Containing Same (337-TA-441, Xilinx, Inc. v. Altera Corporation)
Represented Xilinx in patent infringement case involving field programmable gate array (FPGA).
In the Matter of Certain Programmable Logic Devices and Products Containing Same (337-TA-453 Altera Corporation v. Xilinx, Inc.)
Represented Xilinx in patent infringement case involving field programmable gate array (FPGA) patents.
In the Matter of Certain Phenylene Sulfide Polymers and Polymer Compounds and Products Containing Same (337-TA-296, Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Kureha Chemical Industries Co., Ltd. and Hoechst Celanese Corp.)
Represented Kureha Chemical Industries in patent infringement case involving high-strength plastics.
In the Matter of Certain Semiconductor Memory Devices and Products Containing Same (337-TA-470, Mosel Vitelic Inc. v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al. (Elpida))
Represented Mosel Vitelic in semiconductor device patent infringement.
In the Matter of Certain Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory Devices, Microprocessors and Products Containing Same, (337-TA-431, Rambus, Inc. v. Hitachi LTD)
Represented Hitachi in patent infringement case involving synchronous dynamic random access memory (SDRAM) devices.